<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I post about</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/</link>
	<description>Thoughts of Antonia, Labour activist and feminist in Oxford</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-781</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;No you’re right that those with a moral or religious objection do not have to take part in the process; at the moment, however, they also have an obligation to refer a woman to someone who will treat her.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

An additional problem with this isn't just about WHETHER a doctor refers on, but about WHEN the woman finds out that her doctor isn't pro-choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>No you’re right that those with a moral or religious objection do not have to take part in the process; at the moment, however, they also have an obligation to refer a woman to someone who will treat her.</p></blockquote>
<p>An additional problem with this isn&#8217;t just about WHETHER a doctor refers on, but about WHEN the woman finds out that her doctor isn&#8217;t pro-choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonia</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, political hack, I didn't see that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, political hack, I didn&#8217;t see that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoliticalHackUK</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>PoliticalHackUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-779</guid>
		<description>Just a minor point - the ICM/Guardian poll at the weekend showed that only 20% of the voting public back the 90-day detention period, with 46% backing 28 days. This popular wave of support is an entirely invented proposition by elements of the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a minor point - the ICM/Guardian poll at the weekend showed that only 20% of the voting public back the 90-day detention period, with 46% backing 28 days. This popular wave of support is an entirely invented proposition by elements of the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonia</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-777</guid>
		<description>No you're right that those with a moral or religious objection do not have to take part in the process; at the moment, however, they also have an obligation to refer a woman to someone who will treat her.  This is under sustained attack, both informally by doctors and pharmacists who delay the referral or just plain don't come clean that they won't be referring on, and formally, through lobbying to change the rules so that there is no obligation to refer on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you&#8217;re right that those with a moral or religious objection do not have to take part in the process; at the moment, however, they also have an obligation to refer a woman to someone who will treat her.  This is under sustained attack, both informally by doctors and pharmacists who delay the referral or just plain don&#8217;t come clean that they won&#8217;t be referring on, and formally, through lobbying to change the rules so that there is no obligation to refer on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-776</guid>
		<description>"pressure to allow professionals to opt out of provision but not to have to refer on,"

Now forgive me if I’ve got this wrong but I thought that had always been part of the law? That those with a moral or religious objection do not have to take part in the process?

It would be rather difficult for devout Catholics or Muslims to train as doctors if that were not true would it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;pressure to allow professionals to opt out of provision but not to have to refer on,&#8221;</p>
<p>Now forgive me if I’ve got this wrong but I thought that had always been part of the law? That those with a moral or religious objection do not have to take part in the process?</p>
<p>It would be rather difficult for devout Catholics or Muslims to train as doctors if that were not true would it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan Ilnyckyj</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Milan Ilnyckyj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 22:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2005/11/13/what-i-post-about/#comment-775</guid>
		<description>People wanting to read a really good security related weblog should take a look at the one run by &lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bruce Schneier&lt;/a&gt;. Many of his general observations, in both the blog and his books, informed the writing of &lt;a href="http://www.irsa.ca/NASCAfinal.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;the report to Canada's Department of National Defence&lt;/a&gt; that I drafted earlier this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People wanting to read a really good security related weblog should take a look at the one run by <a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">Bruce Schneier</a>. Many of his general observations, in both the blog and his books, informed the writing of <a href="http://www.irsa.ca/NASCAfinal.pdf" rel="nofollow">the report to Canada&#8217;s Department of National Defence</a> that I drafted earlier this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
