<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A-level results day tomorrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2006/08/16/a-level-results-day-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2006/08/16/a-level-results-day-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>Thoughts of Antonia, Labour activist and feminist in Oxford</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2006/08/16/a-level-results-day-tomorrow/#comment-15435</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2006/08/16/a-level-results-day-tomorrow/#comment-15435</guid>
		<description>It's a shame that discussion of standards degenerates into having a go at pupils. It's also a shame that we can't seem to have a legitimate discussion about standards without someone complaining that we're being unfair to the poor kiddies.

The fact is that A-levels, at least in maths and hard science, have got progressively easier since the 60s. When I sat my A-levels, we had books (bound in red covers, as I remember) containing copies of all the A-level maths papers for 20 years or so. It was the experience of every one of us that the questions at the end of the book were quite easy, and the ones at the beginning were more difficult. It wasn't just a case of topic drift either - it was not uncommon to see an almost identical question reappear several years later. The later version, however, would break down the steps of the calculation with enormous signposts to tell you how to solve the problem.

I absolutely agree with you that it's not the fault of the pupils. They do what they're told, work hard, earn good grades, but don't really have the tools to judge how what they are being taught compares to what the previous generation learned.

I disagree with you when you say we have "a crisis of confidence" in A-levels. What we have is not a lack of faith in the exam, it's a lack of content and rigour. The reason that Universities are having to run more and more remedial courses for first years because they come poorly prepared has nothing to do with confidence, and everything to do with content.

The fault is not with the pupils. The fault lies fairly and squarely with the education system, and  with the parents (who should bear thr responsibility for their child's education,even if they chose to devolve that responsibility to the state.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame that discussion of standards degenerates into having a go at pupils. It&#8217;s also a shame that we can&#8217;t seem to have a legitimate discussion about standards without someone complaining that we&#8217;re being unfair to the poor kiddies.</p>
<p>The fact is that A-levels, at least in maths and hard science, have got progressively easier since the 60s. When I sat my A-levels, we had books (bound in red covers, as I remember) containing copies of all the A-level maths papers for 20 years or so. It was the experience of every one of us that the questions at the end of the book were quite easy, and the ones at the beginning were more difficult. It wasn&#8217;t just a case of topic drift either - it was not uncommon to see an almost identical question reappear several years later. The later version, however, would break down the steps of the calculation with enormous signposts to tell you how to solve the problem.</p>
<p>I absolutely agree with you that it&#8217;s not the fault of the pupils. They do what they&#8217;re told, work hard, earn good grades, but don&#8217;t really have the tools to judge how what they are being taught compares to what the previous generation learned.</p>
<p>I disagree with you when you say we have &#8220;a crisis of confidence&#8221; in A-levels. What we have is not a lack of faith in the exam, it&#8217;s a lack of content and rigour. The reason that Universities are having to run more and more remedial courses for first years because they come poorly prepared has nothing to do with confidence, and everything to do with content.</p>
<p>The fault is not with the pupils. The fault lies fairly and squarely with the education system, and  with the parents (who should bear thr responsibility for their child&#8217;s education,even if they chose to devolve that responsibility to the state.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hughes Views</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2006/08/16/a-level-results-day-tomorrow/#comment-15419</link>
		<dc:creator>Hughes Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2006/08/16/a-level-results-day-tomorrow/#comment-15419</guid>
		<description>Quite right!  My daughter is awaiting her AS results and is really fed up about the things already being said about how easy they are.  Mind you most of the people saying it seem to be sad old losers who have made nothing of their lives and hate to see young people (or anyone come to that) succeeding by working hard.  And all their dire Daily Mail style predictions about how TV, computers, game consoles, mobile phones etc would ruin children's brains turn out to have been wrong as well!  I know that my children have worked harder than I ever did for my A levels and in my day the results went pretty well unnoticed by the Great British Press.....

Q How many Daily Mail readers does it take to change a lightbulb?

A Change?  What is change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite right!  My daughter is awaiting her AS results and is really fed up about the things already being said about how easy they are.  Mind you most of the people saying it seem to be sad old losers who have made nothing of their lives and hate to see young people (or anyone come to that) succeeding by working hard.  And all their dire Daily Mail style predictions about how TV, computers, game consoles, mobile phones etc would ruin children&#8217;s brains turn out to have been wrong as well!  I know that my children have worked harder than I ever did for my A levels and in my day the results went pretty well unnoticed by the Great British Press&#8230;..</p>
<p>Q How many Daily Mail readers does it take to change a lightbulb?</p>
<p>A Change?  What is change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
