<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Very rare post on defence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/</link>
	<description>Thoughts of Antonia, Labour activist and feminist in Oxford</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wozza</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-94998</link>
		<dc:creator>wozza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-94998</guid>
		<description>no Tim, just most of the labour pay-roll vote - and the ones angling for jobs under Gordon, and the ones too scared to make any sort of stand against BAE and the whips despite grave reservations about the Necessity  (and there were many) of the boondoggle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no Tim, just most of the labour pay-roll vote - and the ones angling for jobs under Gordon, and the ones too scared to make any sort of stand against BAE and the whips despite grave reservations about the Necessity  (and there were many) of the boondoggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Roll-Pickering</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-83316</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Roll-Pickering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-83316</guid>
		<description>Were all the MPs who voted for renewal unprincipled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were all the MPs who voted for renewal unprincipled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Gavin Ayling</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-81507</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Gavin Ayling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-81507</guid>
		<description>OT: What, no defence of Gordon Brown's great raid on the poor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT: What, no defence of Gordon Brown&#8217;s great raid on the poor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-81009</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-81009</guid>
		<description>Hi
I too was delighted that my MP, Graham Stringer, voted against Trident.
Shame he supported privatising the probation service - but we can't have everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I too was delighted that my MP, Graham Stringer, voted against Trident.<br />
Shame he supported privatising the probation service - but we can&#8217;t have everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-72662</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.antoniabance.org.uk/2007/03/14/very-rare-post-on-defence/#comment-72662</guid>
		<description>There was a lack of a clear and formal consultation period before the decision was made. This was actually what Tony Blair and his ministers promised but failed to deliver on.

So this is basically another Chevaline: these decisions were already taken some time ago by the British secret state. Now its to be railroaded through parliament. As long as the policy is perceived to be ‘right’ to some folk, including some some in the Labour Party, they are not bothered about deception, secrecy and lack of proper consultation and accountability. Nor even about the huge bill to the taxpayer, apparently.

Wretched stuff - and fully supported by the Tories of course.

Indeed it is at moments like these that one wonders why the Labour Party exists, if it simply pushes through obviously solid Tory policies like this.

The mild and reasonable Lib Dem proposal, to wait a bit with a view to reducing the number of warheads further (perfectly sensible and feasible, although by no means radical) looks decidedly left wing compared to Labour and the Conservatives trying to outbid each other on renewal.

There is absolutely no pressing reason to take this decision now - unless the aim is to railroad it (hence one manufactures time pressure, blackmail etc - the usual Blairite tactics.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a lack of a clear and formal consultation period before the decision was made. This was actually what Tony Blair and his ministers promised but failed to deliver on.</p>
<p>So this is basically another Chevaline: these decisions were already taken some time ago by the British secret state. Now its to be railroaded through parliament. As long as the policy is perceived to be ‘right’ to some folk, including some some in the Labour Party, they are not bothered about deception, secrecy and lack of proper consultation and accountability. Nor even about the huge bill to the taxpayer, apparently.</p>
<p>Wretched stuff - and fully supported by the Tories of course.</p>
<p>Indeed it is at moments like these that one wonders why the Labour Party exists, if it simply pushes through obviously solid Tory policies like this.</p>
<p>The mild and reasonable Lib Dem proposal, to wait a bit with a view to reducing the number of warheads further (perfectly sensible and feasible, although by no means radical) looks decidedly left wing compared to Labour and the Conservatives trying to outbid each other on renewal.</p>
<p>There is absolutely no pressing reason to take this decision now - unless the aim is to railroad it (hence one manufactures time pressure, blackmail etc - the usual Blairite tactics.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
