On loan to Reading

I felt a bit guilty for not doing more this elections cycle. Oxford gets one year in four without elections, and I’ve really enjoyed doing other things like getting stuck into my new job, going on holiday, and trying to be a good local councillor. Still, last time we had a year without elections in 2003, I went to Reading, and after a long day I enjoyed a fantastic night at the count where, two months after the invasion of Iraq, we lost not a single seat. Seeking to repeat the experience a few years later, I jumped on a train south on Wednesday evening.

There is something about campaigning in a city not your own that’s really quite fun - other people do the thinking, and you can just go where you’re sent. I was in Church ward for the early leaflet, and spent the rest of the day in Park ward, doing a bit of delivery, a bit of telling and a lot of knocking-up (less amusingly otherwise known as Get Out the Vote).

I enjoyed meeting real Tories - we don’t have any in Oxford - though disapppointingly I wasn’t telling with a red-in-tooth-and-claw Thatcherite or with Cameroon-groupie, but a lovely older lady with a very upper-crust accent called Eunice, for whom I fetched a chair after it became clear that she wouldn’t last out her stint standing. Reading also has a developing Green problem, and the literature they put around to Reading residents hilariously talks about the difference a Green group on Oxford city council makes. Yet their variety of Greens want to end alternate weekly rubbish collections which would reduce recycling at a stroke, and, given that they have plenty of Tories already you wouldn’t have thought they’d be much room for an individualistic NIMBYist middle-class tax-cutting parade, but hey. Their race analysis is also slightly less advanced than that of our Greens in Oxford - one of their activists commented to one of ours that he didn’t realise there were so many “coloureds” in Park ward. I tried to wind up the Green who was on the gate with me, but disappointingly he didn’t appear to have any political opinions, nodding amiably no matter how outlandish and calculated-to-irritate-the-type-of-Green-I’m-used-to my statements became. It’s really upsetting when one’s foes don’t take the bait, don’t you find? I admit that I was in a pretty strong position, what with our telling constantly interrupted by building noise from the new nursery being built thanks to a Labour government and Labour council, and being able to point at that and the thousands like it all over the country when asked what a Labour government is good for, but I still thought it was a poor show from the Green. No Liberals anywhere in Park, though - very refreshing, though there were some borrowed OULD students in Church ward: I know because their reaction when teased affectionately about whether they needed to shave yet was to declare indignantly that they were at Oxford University, didn’t we know!

The telling was but a brief interlude in the constant trudge of election day. Up and down the Wokingham Road, back and forth between the committee rooms in Liverpool Road and College Road, over to the London Road for a change of scenery. Not having had weeks and months of trudging preparation, my feet didn’t last out as well as usual, and I had to go and buy extra plasters and insoles at teatime ready for the last push. I was really ready for that first pint at five past ten last night.

Unfortunately the Reading election officials had made an incomprehensible decision to postpone the count until today, so there wasn’t to be a repeat of 2003’s fabulous night at the leisure centre. There wasn’t to be a repeat in terms of the results, either: Tony Short, who I had worked hard for all day, lost by seven votes to a Tory. Labour lost seven seats; we’re still in overall control, but it’s not a happy day. One is always convinced, in such tight races, that one should have just knocked on that extra door or tried harder with that potential voter reluctant to go to the polls at 9pm…

4 comments »

  1. Adrian Windisch | 8 May 2007 8:59 pm

    Reading is a town, only Labour people keep mistaking it for a city. They also misrepresent the Green position on Alternate Weekly Collection, which would be a good idea if properly applied with consultation, but a disaster in areas of Reading where rat populations are increasing. Even Tony Blair came out for weekly collection last week, so some other parties are very confused about this issue.

  2. Joe Mc | 9 May 2007 10:01 pm

    Adrian, I always like the ‘would be a good idea if properly applied with consultation’. This to me is generally code for, ‘I want to have my cake and eat it’ and is a cop out. Sorry.

  3. Nick Foster | 10 May 2007 8:20 am

    Looks like you are swallowing the lies and distortions of the Reading Labour Party.
    Labours vote in Park Dropped from 896 to 810 and the Greens went up from 474 to 688 (more than the Tory who beat you), they wouldn’t have asked for your help if they were not really scared of us!
    I’m glad our member unlucky enough to sit next to you didn’t take your bait, have you tried sensible debate rather than wind ups? I don’t think telling on the gate is good time to have a row!
    I notice you didn’t mention the assault on the Tory candidate Wasir Hussain, at least he isn’t a spiteful thug unlike some of Reading Labour Party!
    Next election if the same happend Labour will be out of power in Reading.
    The people of Park chose a real Tory over a pretend neoLabour one.
    HAHAHAHA!

  4. Adrian Windisch | 11 May 2007 1:11 pm

    Joe Mc, some parts of the country have used alternate weekly collection with no difficulty, many others have encountered problems. At least seven councils have returned to weekly collection. Tony Blair said last week he preferred weekly collection, for what thats worth.

    What is the difference that makes the scheme work in some areas and not in others? In some areas people feel the council is listening to their concerns and responding, in others that they are in an ivory tower and don’t listen to anyone.

Leave a comment