24 November 2006 at 1:05 am
As abortion has always been a matter of individual conscience and not of party policy, those opposed and in support of abortion rights always examine the results of the private members’ ballot carefully. Indeed, the 1967 Abortion Act was introduced as a private members’ bill, admittedly one that received parliamentary time from the government of the day. One worry for the pro-choice movement is that an anti-abortion MP comes near the top of the ballot, or that one of the MPs near the top of the ballot is persuaded to propose an anti-abortion bill rather than one of the others from the avalanche I’m sure is landing on their desks from lobbyists as we speak.
Iain Dale pointed me in the direction of the winners in this year’s ballot, and I thought it might be worth examining which of the twenty might pose a risk. Here they are, in order, with how they voted on the bill to restrict abortion proposed last month by Nadine Dorries MP:
1. Nick Hurd (Con Ruislip-Northwood), for
2. Tim Yeo (Con Suffolk South), for
3. Caroline Spelman (Con Meriden), for
4. Gary Streeter (Con Devon South-West), for
5. Graham Stringer (Lab Manchester, Blackley), against
6. Robert Walter (Con Dorset North), for
7. Sir John Butterfill (Con Bournemouth West), no vote
8. Paul Farrelly (Lab Newcastle-under-Lyme), no vote
9. Martin Caton (Lab Gower), no vote
10. Richard Ottaway (Con Croydon South), against
11. Roger Godsiff (Lab Birmingham Sparkbrook and Small Heath), no vote
12. Shailesh Vara (Con Cambridgeshire North West), no vote
13. Alan Duncan (Con Rutland and Melton), no vote
14. John Hayes (Con South Holland and The Deepings), for
15. Barry Sheerman (Lab Huddersfield), against
16. John McDonnell (Lab Hayes and Harlington), against
17. Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Lab Portsmouth North), against
18. Michael Meacher (Lab Oldham West and Royton), no vote
19. Emily Thornberry (Lab Islington South and Finsbury), against
20. Francis Maude (Con Horsham), no vote
By my count from this excellent paper on the success of private members’ bills, 61 private members’ bills which started in the Commons have succeeded in the last decade, though of course in the main they are uncontroversial, which would not be the case for a bill to restrict abortion rights. Iain says that Nick Hurd has already announced he will be backing a bill to transfer power from central government to local communities, so I reckon it’s worth paying attention to what the five other MPs on this list who voted for the bill last month - Tim Yeo, Caroline Spelman, Gary Streeter, Robert Walter and John Hayes - decide to do… After all, Nadine Dorries will be actively encouraging her colleagues to submit a bill to restrict abortion. In this, I am of course assuming that those who felt strongly about this issue probably voted in the division last month, and thus that those who didn’t vote are less likely to pick this issue for their bill.
A quick Google search shows that “Caroline Spelman MP is less moderately vocal but equally opposed [to abortion rights]“, from the pro-choice forum, and that John Hayes has previously called for a reform of abortion law in the House of Commons, as well as co-sponsoring Nadine Dorries’ bill.
In the circumstances, I’m glad to hear that Abortion Rights’ public meeting at the House of Commons last night went well. I think we may need to organise some more this year to defend the right to choose… I’m no expert in parliamentary procedure, but it strikes me that if a bill is proposed, we need to ensure there’s no question of the government giving any time to it, and when/if it makes it to the floor of the house, the right procedures are deployed to ensure it’s variously defeated, runs out of time or is talked out. The last time we had a genuine threat, Joyce Gould, then Labour party women’s officer, ran a ferocious whipping campaign against it; I hope one of our pro-choice women MPs takes up that mantle, if, sadly, it becomes necessary.